Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 15:51:42 +0000 From: james <james@mansionfamily.plus.com> To: Paul Kraus <paul@kraus-haus.org> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS - whole disk or partition or BSD slice? Message-ID: <510D360E.7090100@mansionfamily.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <7D460604-8F6B-454F-B717-678F64A75062@kraus-haus.org> References: <5105BEE4.4030402@mansionfamily.plus.com> <5105D611.4000506@ShaneWare.Biz> <7D460604-8F6B-454F-B717-678F64A75062@kraus-haus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28/01/2013 16:10, Paul Kraus wrote: > I have been using ZFS with GPT partitions with no issues. I have NOT compared performance between whole disk and partitioned, which is where the difference in Solaris arises (ZFS makes better use of the physical drive's write cache). Well, it is the write cache manipulation and flushing that I'd like to have turned on. Anyone know what the score is with FreeBSD?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?510D360E.7090100>