Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 21:57:25 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Jamie Bowden <ragnar@sysabend.org>, David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SGI, XFS and OSS? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990520215619.26546f-100000@cygnus.rush.net> In-Reply-To: <19990521021800.S76043@bitbox.follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 21 May 1999, Eivind Eklund wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 08:08:14PM -0400, Jamie Bowden wrote: > > On Thu, 20 May 1999, Eivind Eklund wrote: > > > > :> This is great news. My slowest SGI systems have faster metadata updates > > :> than my fastest FreeBSD systems, same disk hardware. > > : > > :Running soft updates? > > > > XFS is -FAST- > > How do you measure the speed of XFS vs FFS? I cannot think of any > really decent benchmark without having implementations of both in the > same OS, and being certain that they are optimized the same way. irix doesn't ship with UFS anymore? > Don't the O2s have NVRAM for logging the metadata changes? That'd > make a tremendous difference right away... Are you aware of any board you can get for PCs that provide something like this? thanks, -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990520215619.26546f-100000>