Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 09 Jan 2001 10:53:04 -0700
From:      Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca>
To:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc:        cjclark@alum.mit.edu, Marc Silver <marcs@draenor.org>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: What do these mean? 
Message-ID:  <200101091753.f09Hr4x03729@orthanc.ab.ca>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "09 Jan 2001 11:12:02 %2B0100." <xzpd7dxghl9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Dag-Erling" == Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> writes:

    Dag-Erling> This isn't the only bogosity related to dynamic rules
    Dag-Erling> in ipfw; for instance, 'ipfw list' always lists *all*
    Dag-Erling> dynamic rules even if you specify a rule number on the
    Dag-Erling> command line (it should only display dynamic rules
    Dag-Erling> which were created by the rules listed on the command
    Dag-Erling> line).

Please see PR bin/18550, which has been sitting in the queue for eight
months. It contains a fix for this behaviour.

--lyndon


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101091753.f09Hr4x03729>