Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 12:54:54 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Gregory Bond <gnb@itga.com.au> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why no "date -a"? Message-ID: <280.913895694@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 17 Dec 1998 16:21:35 %2B1100." <199812170521.QAA13657@melba.bby.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199812170521.QAA13657@melba.bby.com.au>, Gregory Bond writes: >This came up on the newsgroup today and I couldn't think of an answer. > >FreeBSD has adjtime(2) and Poul-Henning et al as nanosecond wranglers, yet no >"date -a". This must be a deliberate omission. Why? I havn't needed it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "ttyv0" -- What UNIX calls a $20K state-of-the-art, 3D, hi-res color terminal To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?280.913895694>