Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:27:26 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox <kitbsdlist2@HotPOP.com> To: Paul Robinson <paul@iconoplex.co.uk> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stealthy? Message-ID: <20040614122726.7ab21a86@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <20040614144259.GA4684@iconoplex.co.uk> References: <20040614144259.GA4684@iconoplex.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:42:59 +0100 Paul Robinson <paul@iconoplex.co.uk> wrote: > Apparently, we're part of, and using the products of a stealth > project: > > http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3367381 > > Which inevitably led to one of Slashdot's amusing (sic) BSD > articles: > > http://bsd.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/06/13/2241255&mode=nested&tid=122&tid=185&tid=190&threshold=-1 > > All I can say is, with 2.5 million hosted unique domain names, 4 out > of 10 of the top hosting providers for stability and ~ 400 CVS bits > set, this must be the worst example of stealth I've ever seen. From > now on, I think core@ should be known as "The Bilderberg Group", > hackers@ should be constrained to Freemasons and chat@ should > concentrate on talking about how great Windows is to distract > everybody else. I liked on of the comments i read on /. "FreeBSD is a "stealthy" open source project in the same way the Brooklyn Bridge [nyc.gov] is a "stealthy" public works project"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040614122726.7ab21a86>