Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 22:48:57 +0930 (CST) From: Greg Lewis <glewis@ares.maths.adelaide.edu.au> To: John Baldwin <jobaldwi@vt.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, John Baldwin <jobaldwi@smtp1.erols.com> Subject: Re: Wine breakage... Message-ID: <199907211318.WAA29223@ares.maths.adelaide.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <199907211106.HAA04008@smtp1.erols.com> from John Baldwin at "Jul 21, 1999 07:06:16 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I have wine 990704 running at home without any problems. I used the > > standard distribution plus some of the patches from the ports collection > > (I'd have to look up exactly which patches). I'm running 3.2-R (not sure > > what you are using). What sort of programs are you running with wine and > > are you sure this isn't a wine bug (e.g. you've picked a program to test > > which exercises a memory leak in wine, which is alpha software after all). > > I used all of the patches, if some aren't needed, please let me know and I'll > try that. That may be the problem. BTW, I'm using the standard minesweeper, > notepad, and freecell programs from 95 to test wine with, and they ran fine > with older versions of wine without taking up all my swap. So I don't think > it's bugs in the programs I'm running. :) Checking the source I built from... doesn't look like I used any of the patches :). Here is an extract from top for me. This is just testing with a program from work, which should notionally be bigger than the ones you are testing with. 26061 doc 2 0 7428K 2732K select 0:00 0.15% 0.15% wine 26064 doc 2 0 27840K 6924K sbwait 0:01 0.05% 0.05% wine I'll try and grab freecell or notepad from work tomorrow and test them. -- Greg Lewis glewis@trc.adelaide.edu.au Computing Officer +61 8 8303 5083 Teletraffic Research Centre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907211318.WAA29223>