Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 21:58:26 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: libc shlib version Message-ID: <48719.974354306@winston.osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> of "Wed, 15 Nov 2000 15:53:52 MST." <200011152253.PAA00534@nomad.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> You've *GOT* to be kidding, right? The business world lives on 'fuzzy' > schedules. No, the business world *copes* with fuzzy schedules, it does not excel from relying on such fuzziness though. Many of the most successful projects succeed only because one or more people get a firm enough grip on them to be unfuzzy in all the areas that count and get the necessary features done in time. There are scores of unsuccessful projects which also fail because they're overcome with fuzz. I would prefer that we be one of the latter, hence my statement. :) > It's not just the library that's change, so bumping the libc bersion > will not solve the kernel incompatability problems. That depends on what value of "solve" you're shooting for, and you know that well enough. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48719.974354306>