Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 17:05:54 +0000 From: Gunther Schadow <gunther@aurora.regenstrief.org> To: itojun@iijlab.net Cc: snap-users@kame.net, Shoichi Sakane <sakane@ydc.co.jp>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 4582) Re: KAME SPD bug, please try and confirm ... Message-ID: <3AEEECF2.4C06466E@aurora.regenstrief.org> References: <1771.988736350@itojun.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
itojun@iijlab.net wrote: > > >> sorry if you felt offended. i really think it is issue in routing > >> table, as multiple SPD configuration works just fine here. > > still, there's of course a possibility that you have stepped onto > > some untested code. KAME SNAP kit is, as documented, very experimental > > set of code. if your setup works with plain FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE, > > and if it is a network for production use, i'd suggest you to use > > 4.3-RELEASE instead of SNAP kit. > > if you still are trying to use KAME SNAP, will sys/netkey/key.c > revision 1.185 change the situation? > (pls grab the latest tree via anoncvs) Thank you so much. I will try. I will again try to produce the least complex setup that allows the problem to be reproduced, certainly without IPFIREWALL (or ALTQ) stuff as you suggested. regards -Gunther To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AEEECF2.4C06466E>