Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 23:46:28 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca> To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@freebsd.org> Cc: mharo@area51.fremont.ca.us, FreeBSD Ports Team <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: manpages in PLIST? Message-ID: <20000505234627.A95626@Hamilton-ppp44812.sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <vqcpur0v30l.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami on Fri, May 05, 2000 at 07:14:18PM -0700 References: <20000505152357.A842@area51.fremont.ca.us> <vqcpur0v30l.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 07:14:18PM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
>
> * Is there any reason to have manpages listed in pkg/PLIST?
> * I'm trying to figure out the extent of manpage checking in
> * pkg/PLIST to write for portlint3.
>
> Not that I can know of. Real files and symlinks are both handled by
And absolute pathnames for when you get desparate. :)
MANL=/${PREFIX}/${NOLPREFIXFORYOU}/manl/page.l /${DIFFERENTPREFIX}/page.l
[Well, theoretically it handles this, anyways... :-]
Of course, there's still always one port that doesn't fit.
--
Signature withheld by request of author.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000505234627.A95626>