Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 10:28:03 -0800 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: "Mike Meyer" <mwm@mired.org>, "Doug Young" <dougy@gargoyle.apana.org.au> Cc: <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: 4.3 FreeBSD Message-ID: <001a01c0b559$54499880$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> In-Reply-To: <15038.14016.76133.662835@guru.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Mike Meyer > >On the other hand, these days marketeers seem to be driving release >names/numbers, so these guidelines are no longer useful for commercial >software. > Naw, they are just hiding them. Service Pack #1 is equivalent to version # XX.1, Service Pack #2 is equivalent to version # XX.2, and so on. The rule of thumb is to only implement the version when the NEXT version is released. For example, you implement version 2 on the date version 3 is released, you implement version 3 on the day version 4 is released, etc. It's pretty straightforward. :-) Ted Mittelstaedt tedm@toybox.placo.com Author of: The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide Book website: http://www.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001a01c0b559$54499880$1401a8c0>