Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 15:50:31 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: should_yield problem [Was: svn commit: r251322 - head/sys/kern] Message-ID: <51D41E17.5020904@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <51D317BC.9020204@FreeBSD.org> References: <201306031736.r53Hain5093431@svn.freebsd.org> <51D30463.50608@FreeBSD.org> <CAPyFy2Bd8Vpg4o%2BuNfitRhoe7at96b6JYmCbm37tmG4VO=VMuw@mail.gmail.com> <51D317BC.9020204@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 02/07/2013 21:11 Andriy Gapon said the following: > on 02/07/2013 20:59 Ed Maste said the following: >> What about just initializing td_swvoltick to ticks at td creation? > > I like this idea. What would be the best place(s) to do the initialization? Or, perhaps, td_swvoltick should be moved to td_startcopy-td_endcopy section? -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51D41E17.5020904>