Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:21:15 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= <rene@freebsd.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: chromium@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the last mile? Message-ID: <AANLkTimkYtvYZMHWUiKhofyDjHW_5LZDEEyU77daWcvZ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimbYm2SfZpmbscf6Azi_9v9R95XiYtEroSnJ9Uo@mail.gmail.com> References: <4D9239F7.7020204@freebsd.org> <4D941F6B.3040901@freebsd.org> <AANLkTimbYm2SfZpmbscf6Azi_9v9R95XiYtEroSnJ9Uo@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011/3/31 Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>: > 2011/3/31 Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org>: >> Op 29-03-2011 21:58, Rene Ladan schreef: >>> Hi, >>> >>> in its current state chromium-10.0.648.X looks pretty decent IMO. >>> >> [..] >> >>> The biggest todo for chromium-10.0.648.X is to get it render pages on >>> 8.2 and below. I guess someone with a big machine should build a debug >>> image and/or see what's different libthr on 7.4/8.2 versus CURRENT. >>> >> What if we just commit the port _right now_ after marking it BROKEN on >> 7.X/8.X ? =A0In it's current form nobody can really use the version in t= he >> Ports Tree (or they would have to remove the FORBIDDEN line), if we >> commit this version at least some people can. =A0And we might get more >> eyes to look at this timeout bug. >> >> Maybe it's a bad idea... >> > > This can be a good idea, + documenting that it works if launched with > the no thread option. > I'll try the nothread option. We can add a conditional message about it to = the port for 7.X/8.X. Ren=E9
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimkYtvYZMHWUiKhofyDjHW_5LZDEEyU77daWcvZ>