Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 04 Mar 2000 23:40:49 +0800
From:      Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>
To:        Josef Karthauser <joe@pavilion.net>
Cc:        Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/crypto/openssh login.c sshd.c 
Message-ID:  <20000304154049.C402D1CE0@overcee.netplex.com.au>
In-Reply-To: Message from Josef Karthauser <joe@pavilion.net>  of "Sat, 04 Mar 2000 13:56:08 GMT." <20000304135608.D34231@florence.pavilion.net> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 07:51:47PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> > markm       2000/03/02 19:51:47 SAST
> > 
> > FreeBSD International Crypto Repository
> > 
> >   Modified files:
> >     crypto/openssh       login.c sshd.c 
> >   Log:
> >   Sync with Freefall.
> 
> Mark,
> 
> Am I right in thinking that Internat and Freefall are pretty much the same?
> If so what's to stop us from having part of the Freefall repository
> cvsup'd from Internat?

I have been advocating this for a few weeks now.  It would save a lot of
duplicated work.

However, the src/crypto/openssl/crytpo/rsa/rsa_eay.c file has to be left
out to satisfy the folks (mirrors mostly) who are worried about being an
accessory to patent infringement.  This (fortunately) is easy to arrange
with the cvsup refuse file.  (I know it's easy because I already cvsup the
internat source to freefall and compare the two sets of code)

NetBSD have announced that they are going to do this (or are already doing
so).  The new US crypto rules mean that it's ok for the US based folks to
work on the internat.freebsd.org code.

Cheers,
-Peter




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000304154049.C402D1CE0>