Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 17:57:05 -0400 From: Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU> To: Randy Katz <randyk@ccsales.com> Cc: David Greenman <dg@root.com>, Christopher Michaels <ChrisMic@clientlogic.com>, "'Mike Squires'" <mikes@sir-alan.chem.indiana.edu>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Setting Intel Pro100B to half duplex Message-ID: <199910122157.AA202875426@broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 12 Oct 1999 14:23:42 PDT." <19991012142342.A15492@ccsales.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I didn't say it was my engineering strategy. I just reported on what I'd read and asked for some actual data to back up what appears on the surface to be a wild rumor fired largely by war stories of old equipment built to a different spec than the current one. Do *you* know with any certainty if autonegotiation problems are due to old hardware, mis-configuration (aka pilot error), or just brain-dead equipment? How about sharing what you know instead of challenging my trouble-shooting skills? This is freebsd-questions. We're supposed to be helping each other here. -Mitch >I'ts a nice story, just wait 'till *YOU* have a problem with >autonegotiation, will you be smart enough to check that first >or will your network suffer endless packet loss...until you >call in a consultant...like David Greenman? > >Take care, >Randy Katz > >> >Also I'm curious about your statement about autonegotiate being >> >notorious. I've heard this stated frequently but never with any data >> >to back it up. After the above reply from Mr. Greenman I read up on >> >autonegotiation in 3 different books on high-speed networking and have >> >come to the _tentative_ conclusion that this rumor is based on old >> >hardware. >> > >> >It seems that the 100 Mbps ethernet spec pre-dates the NWAY >> >autonegotation spec and in fact there was a different method used for >> >autonegotiation in the earliest days of 100 Mbps ethernet. My guess is >> >that this rumor was started during those early days and is still being >> >dutifully passed on by those who experienced problems with the early >> >non-NWAY equipment (and those who've heard the war stories from them). >> > >> >Can you (or anyone) state with any degree of certainty that any modern >> >equipment built with NWAY autonegotiation exhibits any problems with >> >autonegotiation? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199910122157.AA202875426>