Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Sep 2008 11:12:37 +0300
From:      Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
To:        "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
Cc:        David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: bad NFS/UDP performance 
Message-ID:  <E1KjUur-0006DE-GA@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
In-Reply-To: <20080926221700.1C4AE4500E@ptavv.es.net> 
References:  <20080926221700.1C4AE4500E@ptavv.es.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> --==_Exmh_1222467420_5817P
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> 
> David,
> 
> You beat me to it.
> 
> Danny, read the iperf man page:
>        -b, --bandwidth n[KM]
>               set  target  bandwidth to n bits/sec (default 1 Mbit/sec).  This
>               setting requires UDP (-u).
> 
> The page needs updating, though. It should read "-b, --bandwidth
> n[KMG]. It also does NOT require -u. If you use -b, UDP is assumed.

I did RTFM(*), but when i tried it just wouldn't work, I tried today
and it's actually working - so don't RTFM before coffee!
btw, even though iperf sucks, netperf udp tends to bring the server down
to it's knees.

danny
PS: * - i don't seem to have the iperf man, all I have is iperf -h





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1KjUur-0006DE-GA>