Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 13:09:43 -0700 (PDT) From: James Phillips <anti_spam256@yahoo.ca> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [#24512320] Re: Apache22 Upgrade Failure Message-ID: <859576.19201.qm@web65512.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20100522120020.D04821065691@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 06:43:59 +0100 > From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> > Subject: Re: [#24512320] Re: Apache22 Upgrade Failure > To: Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com> > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <4BF76F1F.8040501@infracaninophile.co.uk> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUTF-8 >=20 <SNIP! (Sig now invalid anyway)> >=20 > On 22/05/2010 24:01:52, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > Is someone saying that FreeBSD lists are not hosted on > Mailman? Or is the > > list admin on holiday on the space station? Mailman > supports regexes for > > blocking, IIRC. >=20 > Check the message headers: the bogus replies to you come > direct from > mpcustomer.com and don't go anywhere FreeBSD mailman. >=20 > Blacklisting support@mpcustomer.com > would be an effective fix, if you > have that much control over your mail system. >=20 > =A0=A0=A0 Cheers, >=20 > =A0=A0=A0 Matthew While you don't say anything explicitly incorrect, I think it is trickier t= han that: the "From:" address is listed as freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; i= s is the "Reply-To:" address that is support@mpcustomer.com. I was also reluctant to report the message as spam since the bulk of it was= my own message! I don't want replies to my messages being hit by the spam = filter. IMO, the message body is being used as unique "filler text" to get = past Bayesian filters. I don't claim to know if the effect is intentional or accidental. -James Phillips =0A=0A
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?859576.19201.qm>