Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:42:29 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <oceanare@pacific.net.sg> To: "Heiko Wundram (Beenic)" <wundram@beenic.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: C++ Template Functions Message-ID: <4773C7E5.3090302@pacific.net.sg> In-Reply-To: <200712271621.12167.wundram@beenic.net> References: <200712271621.12167.wundram@beenic.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote: > > The problem is most probably related to the fact that the group of member > functions is only discriminated by return type (i.e., the template parameter > defines the return type), not by parameter (which could be inferred). if nothing got changed over the last years, it is not possible to do this by definition. When I needed this the last time, I used a enum as an additonal parameter to achieve this. I know, it is not perfect, but it leads to what I intended. It should work here too. I know, it is not the prefect solution. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4773C7E5.3090302>