Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 22:52:17 -0400 From: J David <j.david.lists@gmail.com> To: Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: zfs_enable vs zfs_load in loader.conf (but neither works) Message-ID: <CABXB=RQoza2YFF81KH_sPksnW5xJuCwd6xaWG4z0TQtS%2BnOs%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <522D30C9.8000203@bluerosetech.com> References: <CABXB=RTz6jM=B895Bo6Kp-ZAf2pvTZkm-HfS=PrfX=aMKqjMbw@mail.gmail.com> <522D30C9.8000203@bluerosetech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> wrote: > Did you build and install new boot blocks? Yes. Oddly, setting: zfs set mountpoint=legacy data/root (plus the appropriate fstab entry) instead of zfs set mountpoint=/ data/root seems to produce a bootable system, although it absolutely should not be necessary to do things that way anymore. Weird.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABXB=RQoza2YFF81KH_sPksnW5xJuCwd6xaWG4z0TQtS%2BnOs%2Bg>