Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 06:52:24 -0700 From: "Earl A. Killian" <earl@killian.com> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: nat vs. state Message-ID: <16021.30488.437183.530248@sax.killian.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is it safe to assume packets diverted to NAT are "safe" and don't need further checking? In particular, can the use of dynamic/stateful rules be skipped for NAT packets? It seems so, because NAT is already stateful.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16021.30488.437183.530248>