Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:56:59 -0300 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Bj?rn K?nig <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de> Subject: Re: Adding k9 and k10 to bsd.cpu.mk Message-ID: <200708312257.00730.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20070901013733.GA12544@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <-3502020561049594852@unknownmsgid> <200708312226.26977.joao@matik.com.br> <20070901013733.GA12544@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 31 August 2007 22:37:33 Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:26:25PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote: > > On Friday 31 August 2007 21:20:30 JoaoBR wrote: > > > > > opterons are not easy but it is already kind of advanced cpu so > > > > > could be > > > > > > > > Why are Opteron's any harder? > > > > > > because all of them are 64bit but some older ones are not SSE3 capabl= e, > > > < 250 I guess now but 252 is but not 100% sure > > > > so just a thought, I have no not-sse3 capable anymore so I could check= =20 > > but asking the gcc guys here ... > > > > what if I try to compile with -msse3 and it is not available, does it go > > through or do I get invalid compile option and if it go through what may > > it cost? > > Yes, it will compile the code. The result will most likely not run > if some code was translated to use a sse3 feature. well,question is: will this kernel boot and/or will it crash because of thi= s=20 cmppile options -msse3 - or not? =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200708312257.00730.joao>