Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:31:34 -0400 From: Jim Trigg <jtrigg@spamcop.net> To: Timothy Snowberger <tsnow@tabletoptelephone.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem upgrading Message-ID: <20121018163134.GA28941@spamcop.net> In-Reply-To: <507F1FA2.7000008@tabletoptelephone.com> References: <20121017142733.GJ75370@spamcop.net> <507F1FA2.7000008@tabletoptelephone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:14:10PM -0700, Timothy Snowberger wrote: > On 10/17/2012 7:27 AM, Jim Trigg wrote: > > Any suggestions on how to fix this? > > > > --- > > argent(1) /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster# freebsd-update -r 9.0-RELEASE upgrade > > Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y > > ... > > Fetching metadata signature for 9.0-RELEASE from update5.FreeBSD.org... done. > > Fetching metadata index... done. > > Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. > > Applying metadata patches... done. > > Fetching 1 metadata files... done. > > > > The update metadata is correctly signed, but > > failed an integrity check. > > Cowardly refusing to proceed any further. > > sed -i '' -e 's/=_/=%@_/' /usr/sbin/freebsd-update > > See http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-October/064321.html > > "First, a minor change must be made to the freebsd-update code in order > for it to accept file names appearing in FreeBSD 9.0 which contain the '%' > and '@' characters; without this change, freebsd-update will error out > with the message "The update metadata is correctly signed, but failed an > integrity check". " This fixed it. Thanks, Jim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121018163134.GA28941>