Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 12:52:54 -0400 From: Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mailman 3 on FreeBSD- or mailman replacement? Message-ID: <20200513125254.0000259b@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <17e9d3c4-2cab-922c-c3d8-1ebef0073556@kicp.uchicago.edu> References: <17e9d3c4-2cab-922c-c3d8-1ebef0073556@kicp.uchicago.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/vI0SCMBsRzAap6HM.N=xeym Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 13 May 2020 09:48:38 -0500, Valeri Galtsev commented: >I'm sure I'm not the only one who runs mailman on FreeBSD servers. Now=20 >that python 2.7 is about to go, mailman 2 will follow. There is >mailman 3 that is based on python 3. There is, however, no mailman 3 >port. I wonder if someone already asked mailman port maintainer about >mailman 3. I do not like to bother busy person(s) if someone already >did. > >Or, maybe, install it using pip (pip 3 with python v. 3.x) as mailman=20 >website describes for variety of scenarios? This basically brings >server update one step towards mess. This URL lists several alternatives. https://alternativeto.net/software/mailman/?platform=3Dself-hosted -=20 Jerry --Sig_/vI0SCMBsRzAap6HM.N=xeym Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEIQb/tTwl6I1ueEVtOHMGOIfexWQFAl68JeYACgkQOHMGOIfe xWRJZQf+IkNAoAE9kH8Lw/WczMgfJKc/6pva23UTfHXvIVYCb/FVYWa4BCjQJyXd SXuxzE25sSp1bw4LnkeWlyXRpPjgPNUWs7Dmbd8IIssyQhPKjfxc9MS7PQmw0Fv7 xXt9vIVDBWSjRoNr8UYYS+wboPA8EcGo2omN7CmtzGnz5bV+ZTrFxLm2ktDlAjQo nYJ//gwipwr63GMCaXFeQRMQzPyBrUBcmiriPXu26tvFYHID9ZWWq921Plk9SLzC mAENgOkY1219GOddXb0LWuXzOG7+tsOQf/8b0L5WklBG06TZDCqDvpK69dbHJzNR zalidUvSRad4Wi+Xt91QQyn7//pc1Q== =+9Ig -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/vI0SCMBsRzAap6HM.N=xeym--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200513125254.0000259b>