Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:56:04 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: bf1783@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "options atapicam" and/or "device ATA_CAM" in kernel config? Message-ID: <44ehwsthx7.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <CAGFTUwM8s%2BRUxfbfadD53nDB=zWrjywMp_YunGNqgg6h%2BC6tAw@mail.gmail.com> (b. f.'s message of "Sun, 27 Nov 2011 23:23:56 %2B0000") References: <CAGFTUwM=f03PMVvL45-Ov965EqN-Lea_RtW1ksX94vbefn%2BYpg@mail.gmail.com> <44ehwt5r9g.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <CAGFTUwM8s%2BRUxfbfadD53nDB=zWrjywMp_YunGNqgg6h%2BC6tAw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> writes: > The handbook does contain some oblique and scattered references to the > new code, or at least to constructs that are common to both the old > and the new code, but the addition of a brief discussion of the > differences between the new and old ATA code in the handbook -- i.e., > the kernel and userland components that are now obsolete, and their > replacements -- might be of some help to users. The primary author of > the new code did add some material to various notes and manpages, but > he has been very busy writing and debugging code, and English is not > his first language, so others will have to supplement his efforts. > Perhaps you could ask for some additions on the freebsd-doc mailing > list? I started writing some additions as soon as I noticed the issue. They won't be sufficient, since I don't yet have a 9.x system, but they'll be a start.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44ehwsthx7.fsf>