Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:07:38 -0600 From: Patrick Bowen <pbowen@fastmail.fm> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVSup question Message-ID: <45DC987A.9030209@fastmail.fm> In-Reply-To: <45DC9611.9040700@schrodinger.com> References: <45DC8C84.3070907@schrodinger.com> <45DC9175.6010508@joeholden.co.uk> <45DC9611.9040700@schrodinger.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Simon Gao wrote: > What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD, > then may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there > is no such things as stable or current ports? > Simon > > > Joe Holden wrote: >> Simon Gao wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1. Is it safe to update >>> ports to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable? >>> >> >> Ports are independant of base branch, ports should generally be HEAD >> (tag=.). >> >> HTH, >> Joe >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > No such thing as -stable or -current ports. Patrick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45DC987A.9030209>