Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:29:50 -0500 From: Eric <heli@mikestammer.com> To: Maxim Khitrov <mkhitrov@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: porteasy vs portupgrade Message-ID: <46A8BDEE.5080104@mikestammer.com> In-Reply-To: <26ddd1750707260823s7a7de6e7k59ac18b5e1216d94@mail.gmail.com> References: <46A7E417.5040800@123.com.sv> <46A8144C.7010503@crackmonkey.us> <46A8B49C.6070903@123.com.sv> <46A8B301.7080903@mikestammer.com> <26ddd1750707260823s7a7de6e7k59ac18b5e1216d94@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim Khitrov wrote: > On 7/26/07, Eric <heli@mikestammer.com> wrote: > > Do you simply use 'portmaster -a' to update everything? I've tried > using it a few times, but it never recompiled ports that depend on the > one being updated. I recall there was an option to do that, but you > had to specify each port manually for that to work. How do you get it > to update all out-of-date ports and recompile everything depending on > those ports? i usually just issue the -a switch. No issues yet in over a year of doing it that way. Why recompile everything that depends on a port unless you have to? things like this are usually in UPDATING, so i do it when i need to, not every time.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46A8BDEE.5080104>