Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 11:01:48 -0400 From: Daniel Staal <DStaal@usa.net> To: =?UTF-8?Q?=22C=2E_Bergstr=C3=B6m=22?= <cbergstrom@pathscale.com>, FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Lennart Poettering: BSD Isn't Relevant Anymore Message-ID: <5E06FE1D432A00CE74B1DA1A@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> In-Reply-To: <4E22DFE9.7050007@pathscale.com> References: <20110717071059.25971662@scorpio> <CAGwOe2YpUXgFx1f_1UWHNt4S=p=X1Soa348KWR9BTrjxF0bAwA@mail.gmail.com> <4E22DFE9.7050007@pathscale.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--As of July 17, 2011 8:13:13 PM +0700, "C. Bergstr=C3=B6m" is alleged to = have=20 said: > 1) Why care about *BSD as a desktop? > 2) Why care about *BSD as a workstation? (Which I see as a next level in > stability/usability beyond a toy "desktop") --As for the rest, it is mine. Because it is easier to get your admins to support a server if they can=20 have a working development desktop that matches the server's OS and config. = (Apart from their interface and development software, which would only be=20 on the dev box.) Just a thought. ;) Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. ---------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5E06FE1D432A00CE74B1DA1A>