Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 06:23:28 -0500 From: dweimer <dweimer@dweimer.net> To: Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> Cc: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upcoming Releases Message-ID: <91216ae32782a50986763e7bc1c3a339@dweimer.net> In-Reply-To: <D7F159DB-757F-4637-A9A7-B9F4C10F665C@lafn.org> References: <EEFD0376-2038-4801-9A7A-BF342B66F029@lafn.org> <20160305181742.9c3abe96.freebsd@edvax.de> <DE7BAC1A-0B40-4B2A-861A-6AE7B16FAC0D@lafn.org> <DBC62E3B-B07D-4A3F-AD22-E3EB62484725@lafn.org> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1603152209110.3734@wonkity.com> <D7F159DB-757F-4637-A9A7-B9F4C10F665C@lafn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2016-03-16 12:20 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 15 March 2016, at 21:11, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>
>>> I recently saw a comment in one of the maillists that 11.0 was likely
>>> to have the new packetized base feature. That tells me that 11.0 is
>>> most likely to be dicey to work with. I am reminded when the new pkg
>>> system came out and the supporting servers were compromised.
>>
>> To the best of my knowledge, there was no relation between pkg and any
>> compromises.
>
> There was a period where the regular pkg servers were not available
> because they had to be rebuilt. I don't recall the dates. It was not
> pkg_ng, but the first major revision to pkg after that.
>
It wasn't because of the pkg / pkg_ng update though, if memory servers
me correct a committer's username/password was comprised. It was just a
coincidence that it happened around the same time update, but wasn't
related to it.
--
Thanks,
Dean E. Weimer
http://www.dweimer.net/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?91216ae32782a50986763e7bc1c3a339>