Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Oct 2015 20:22:53 -0500
From:      Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To:        Ian Fitzgerald <ianf@ozemail.com.au>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Adding 9.1 disk to 10.2 machine
Message-ID:  <CA%2BtpaK1-HwJNd3sgBfoY0B7Q=NftJA3M0bD4k%2BDZhyx9S=G1cw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <003001d11050$b36b8050$1a4280f0$@com.au>
References:  <003001d11050$b36b8050$1a4280f0$@com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Ian Fitzgerald <ianf@ozemail.com.au> wrote:

> I have a second disk with data written on a FreeBSD 9.1 machine. I removed
> the disk and used the first disk for a clean install of 10.2.
>
> Re-fitting the second disk, the second disk is recognised as ada1.
>
>
>
> I wish to mount it as /disk2 (created on /), without newfs as I wish to
> retain the data on it. My attempts at placing an entry in /etc/fstab were
>
> /dev/ada1p2      /disk2    ufs          rw 2 2
>
> But at boot the OS reports disk labelling inconsistency
>
>
>
> I am aware that there is a change to the filing system boot procedure, but
> I
> am not sure whether it began at FBD 9.3 or FBD 10.1
>
>
>
> Should I reinstall FBD 9.3 (available), look for a 9.1 download, or is
> there
> an easier way using 10.2
>

What happens when you do

mount -t ufs /dev/ada1p2 /data2

Please provide the console output, not an explanation.

-- 
Adam



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK1-HwJNd3sgBfoY0B7Q=NftJA3M0bD4k%2BDZhyx9S=G1cw>