Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      30 Jun 2005 17:24:16 +0200
From:      Christian Laursen <xi@borderworlds.dk>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: background fsck can be dangerous!
Message-ID:  <86hdffj2an.fsf@borg.borderworlds.dk>
In-Reply-To: <00e101c57d7d$b4ae1a20$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
References:  <200506291704.50185.ndenev@icdsoft.com> <059901c57cb4$9a366220$7f06000a@int.mediasurface.com> <20050630060612.GF1074@green.homeunix.org> <42C3F7F3.809@speakeasy.net> <00e101c57d7d$b4ae1a20$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk> writes:

> /me looks forward to a journaling FS The FS is the one area that
> really lets FreeBSD down in my
> opinion. Wish I had 1. the time and 2. the knowledge to help
> out with dev in the area but unfortunately I have neither :(

Remember that if you are having trouble with softupdates and background
fsck reporting inconsistencies, journalling will just give you silent
filesystem corruption instead.

-- 
Christian Laursen



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86hdffj2an.fsf>