Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:48:06 -0400
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com>
To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
Cc: gnome@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ${PREFIX}/include/nss/nss
Message-ID: <200510091748.07488@aldan>
In-Reply-To: <1128814097.47852.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
References: <200510051413.j95EDBi2038518@blue.virtual-estates.net> <1128814097.47852.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 08 October 2005 07:28 pm, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
= Yes, but as you pointed out, it will require changes to the
= NSS-dependent ports (as well as plist changes to security/nss itself).
= If you want to test all the ports, and submit a complete patch, that
= would be great.
I seem to vaguely recall you having a cluster capable of quickly
testing things like this :-)
To make things easier, how about creating a symlink:
${PREFIX}/include/nss/nss -> .
?
-mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200510091748.07488>