Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 16:10:30 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> Cc: mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith), current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kvm question Message-ID: <199901242110.QAA17006@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <199901231904.LAA18363@bubba.whistle.com> References: <199901231658.IAA00639@dingo.cdrom.com> <199901231904.LAA18363@bubba.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sat, 23 Jan 1999 11:04:15 -0800 (PST), Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> said: > Peter pointed out that having the sysctl's as symbols was a nice > advantage of the current system. How important is this? I don't think it's important at all. (Then again, I liked the old system.) > If we were willing to give this up, then the SYSCTL() macro could > just expand to a SYSINIT() that called sysctl_add_subtree() (or > whatever you want to call it) upon loading. Seems reasonable to me. The only problem with this is likely to be OID_AUTO, which I happen to think is bogus anyway. It is vital that we maintain the ability to reference sysctl entities by compile-time constant integers, so as not to break backwards compatibility with other 4.4 systems and the Stevens books. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901242110.QAA17006>