Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 20:52:19 +0930 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <darius@dons.net.au> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, (Daniel O'Connor) <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, (Richard Wackerbarth) <rkw@dataplex.net>, (Mike Smith) <msmith@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: How about building modules along with the kernel? Message-ID: <XFMail.000430205219.darius@dons.net.au> In-Reply-To: <200004282005.NAA27418@usr08.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28-Apr-00 Terry Lambert wrote: > I think the issue is being raised in the context of dual boot > machines; ifit weren't, then "JFS, E2FS, KFS, etc." would have > no relevence, as you say. > I think you are missing the context here. I wasn't under that impression. I think having *our* boot loader grok *other* OS's is a little silly. They have their own boot loaders :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.000430205219.darius>