Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 18:32:16 +0800 From: Najib Ninaba <najib_ninaba@yahoo.com> To: Alson van der Meulen <alm@flutnet.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HA-NFS on FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20010730183216.A4665@srikandi> In-Reply-To: <20010728153822.B8675@md2.mediadesign.nl>; from alm@flutnet.org on Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 03:38:22PM %2B0200 References: <004001c116df$9854d8e0$0e00000a@tomcat> <20010728153822.B8675@md2.mediadesign.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Is there a heartbeat/failover software on FreeBSD? In Linux, I usually run Heartbeat or Kimberlite for HA. But I would prefer FreeBSD as it is more robust especially filesystems. Regards, Najib Ninaba On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 03:38:22PM +0200, Alson van der Meulen wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 05:03:33PM -0400, Andrew C. Hornback wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of atul n vidwa= nsa > > > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 7:07 AM > > > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > > Subject: HA-NFS on FreeBSD? > > > > > > To, > > > Whom so it concerns, > > > I want to implement an Highly Available Network File > > > Server, but i can not decide which OS to use, FREEBSD or LINUX. > > > If anyone can give me suggestion on it,he/she is well come. > > > Thanx, > > > Atul N. Vidwansa > >=20 > > You will definately want to use FreeBSD for this, along with the proper > > hardware for the task. FreeBSD's standard file system is much more rel= iable > > than the ones available for Linux. And the cornerstone of high availab= ility > > is reliability. > Do you really expect that people on a FreeBSD list prefer Linux to > FreeBSD? You can't really expect a fair comparison between two operating > systems on the list of one of the OSes IMHO... >=20 > BTW: UFS with softupdates is indeed more reliable then ext2 with async > mounts, but the reliability of ReiserFS/XFS/JFS on Linux will be quite > good too I guess... I'd personally trust the FreeBSD kernel more for > stability then the Linux kernel, but there are Linux servers running > reliable too... >=20 > Maybe a topic for freebsd-advocacy? :) > --=20 > ,-------------------------------------------. > > Name: Alson van der Meulen < > > Personal: alson@flutnet.org < > > School: alson@gymnasiumleiden.nl < > `-------------------------------------------' > The sprinkler system isn't supposed to leak is it? > --------------------------------------------- >=20 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message --=20 Najib Ninaba=20 "Life's unfair - but having the root password helps!" -- PGP fingerprint B338 7EC2 B737 3BAA 03B1 38C7 0832 B6CF 160F 496E -- To verify the signature, get my PGP public key at http://www.keyserver.net/en/ KeyID:0x160F496E --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7ZTewCDK2zxYPSW4RAm/hAJ9ooRAsqXBmJlNxQPH6GsigA6bfEACeM3pE pTXXH+v6b42J3chbi6qPi1A= =IybA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010730183216.A4665>