Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Oct 2001 10:14:14 -0800
From:      Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com>
To:        Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ia64/ia64 interrupt.c mp_machdep.c
Message-ID:  <20011029101414.A37597@gauss.cup.hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20011029093305.N549-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com>
References:  <200110290734.f9T7YmZ97365@freefall.freebsd.org> <20011029093305.N549-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:33:27AM +0000, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> 
> > marcel      2001/10/28 23:34:48 PST
> >
> >   Modified files:
> >     sys/ia64/ia64        interrupt.c mp_machdep.c
> >   Log:
> >   o  Send a test IPI from the BSP to itself at the same time APs
> >      are woken up.
> >   o  Make IPIs synchronuous by default. If we want asynchronuous
> >      IPIs, we may want to make the memory fence controllable.
> 
> Hmm. Looks like you are dangerously close to starting those other cpus...

It looks like APs are woken up, because the test IPI is delivered.
I just need to have the OS_BOOT_RENDEZ do sufficient initializations.
I don't think I have any DTR enties because I couldn't see any data
on the screen when writing to the frame-buffer as a way to see if
the AP actually woke up.

BTW: I moved scanning the MADT to a place where it now happens to
be called only when SMP is defined. This is bogus. I probably
broke non SMP configs :-/

-- 
 Marcel Moolenaar	  USPA: A-39004		 marcel@xcllnt.net

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011029101414.A37597>