Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:52:13 +0000 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step5, pam_opie OPIE auth fix for review Message-ID: <200201211352.g0LDqEt39193@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: <20020121133326.GA35793@nagual.pp.ru> ; from "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> "Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:33:27 %2B0300." References: <20020121133326.GA35793@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 14:07:48 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> writes: > > > Umm, you can't use opiechallenge() for that. You're not supposed to > > > call opiechallenge() without also calling opieverify() (plus, I think > > > opiechallenge() "consumes" a challenge). Use opielookup() instead. > > > > Even better, opie_haskey() (which is a wrapper around opielookup()). > > New patch attached. > > Yes, this patch works as expected, but I doubt about opie_haskey() status. > It looks like non-standard FreeBSD addition since it is in the local > opieextra.c file and not in contrib/opie. If you care about > machine independance, better use opielookup() directly. No, that is OK. :-) The FreeBSD PAM modules are all written from scratch as BSD PAM modules. M -- o Mark Murray \_ FreeBSD Services Limited O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200201211352.g0LDqEt39193>