Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 20:38:05 -0400 From: Chris Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@regency.nsu.ru> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Pete Fritchman <petef@freebsd.org>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils Makefile ports/sysutils/wmflame Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/sysutils/wmflame/files patch-Makefile Message-ID: <20020602003805.GA78919@darkstar.doublethink.cx> In-Reply-To: <20020601103343.B7345@regency.nsu.ru> References: <200205311247.g4VCl7A02204@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020531102901.A28622@xor.obsecurity.org> <20020531173749.GA41463@peitho.fxp.org> <20020601103343.B7345@regency.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 10:33:43AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:37:50PM -0400, Chris Faulhaber wrote: > > On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 10:29:01AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 05:47:07AM -0700, Pete Fritchman wrote: > > > > petef 2002/05/31 05:47:07 PDT > > > >=20 > > > > Modified files: > > > > sysutils Makefile=20 > > > > Added files: > > > > sysutils/wmflame Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr=20 > > > > pkg-plist=20 > > > > sysutils/wmflame/files patch-Makefile=20 > > > > Log: > > > > Add wmflame 0.60, a dockapp that shows the load average as a flam= e. > > >=20 > > > How is this different to wmfire? > > >=20 > >=20 > > For one, wmflame appears to be maintained whereas I have had > > to host the wmfire distfile for over 6 months now due to the > > author's site disappearing. Assuming wmflame does the same > > thing, I will probably remove wmfire in the near future. >=20 > IMHO there is no need to remove wmfire, since they are still pretty > different, and frankly, after about a week of running wmfire and > wmflame, I stuck with wmfire as more appealing to my eye ;-) >=20 > It seems fair to leave the users ability to decide. As for being > un-maintained, I would not consider this any serious issue unless > we discover some real problems with current version of wmfire. >=20 If/since there is a difference between the two I have no problem with leaving wmfire in the ports tree. --=20 Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: FreeBSD: The Power To Serve iEYEARECAAYFAjz5aO0ACgkQObaG4P6BelCZXACggU022fZQiN/DgRn00RXmRkbr o8gAniSoKj5RyauTdUncTzdrDZNDJoBh =dEim -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020602003805.GA78919>