Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 00:38:36 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch> Subject: Re: fstack protector Message-ID: <20030412073836.GA86038@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030411115522.I6045@odysseus.silby.com> References: <20030411111302.G4749@cvs.imp.ch> <20030411115522.I6045@odysseus.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:58:02AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > One possible solution would be to have a gcc-ssp port which would build a > SSP version of the base system's compiler, and call it gcc-ssp or > something. Then we could make certain ports depend on using it, perhaps. That's the best solution for FreeBSD. You'd just set CC and CFLAGS if you want to build with it, as usual. Be aware that some ports will not run when built with -fstack-protector, last time I checked (XFree86 is one). Kris --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+l8J7Wry0BWjoQKURAkcoAKDFUgNvqCXGfWqcS4y5TQzKXMro9ACeKudb HIhM/NFyF7E0D6o6Kadq8fs= =yXCh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030412073836.GA86038>