Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      14 Oct 2004 11:55:29 -0400
From:      Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To:        Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: automount vs Solaris
Message-ID:  <44vfdds39q.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041008084627.GA48159@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
References:  <200410072252.i97Mqifa084091@wattres.Watt.COM> <20041008084627.GA48159@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> writes:

> On the other hand, there is this:
> 
>     http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-September/036786.html
> 
>     http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1001154+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2004/cvs-all/20040905.cvs-all
> 
> so there will be autofs support in 5.3-RELEASE.

That's on 6.x, not 5.x; is there any reason to think it will get
MFC'd?  [At all; I'd be surprised if release engineering okayed
it for 5.3.]

Be well.
-- 
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
		http://be-well.ilk.org:8088/~lowell/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44vfdds39q.fsf>