Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 09 Oct 2004 21:49:30 -0700
From:      Balakumar Velmurugan <vbkumar@mataira.com>
To:        Vulpes Velox <v.velox@vvelox.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Release Question
Message-ID:  <4168BF5A.2050004@mataira.com>
In-Reply-To: <20041009183626.74f97fb7@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net>
References:  <41686104.20409@mataira.com> <20041009183626.74f97fb7@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vulpes Velox wrote:

>On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 15:07:00 -0700
>Balakumar Velmurugan <vbkumar@mataira.com> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Hi,
>>     We are starting development on a new project that would go 
>>production in the fall of 2005. I have been evaluating Release 4.x
>>and 5.x branches for the suitability. Our target platform is AMD64
>>and AMD32 uni-processor systems. We like most of 5.x features except
>>for its performance and conerns about the availability of a STABLE
>>version in our time window,  and I would like your opinion to choose
>>the right FreeBSD version tree to start the development right now.
>>BTW,  we dont have any plans to run on SMP architecture, our target
>>platform will always be uni-processor based. Questions are,
>>
>>1. By Sep 2005, do you think 5.x performance will be optimized and
>>be comparable to today's 4.x stable versions ?
>>    
>>
>
>Which did you test? Did you turn debugging and ect off? Tried
>5.3beta7 yet?
>  
>

I tried 5.2.1 and havent tried the beta7, yet.  Can you tell me, what is 
the release tag for beta7 ?. RELENG_5_3_BETA7 didnt work for me !! 
Thanks for your pointers.

>  
>
>>2. By Sep 2005, do you think 5.x will be as stable as today's 4.x 
>>released versions ?
>>    
>>
>
>http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/schedule.html
>
>  
>
>>3.  What is the most architecturally optimized FreeBSD version if he
>>primary application is network services, IP forwarding and various 
>>TCP/UDP services ?
>>4.  What is the most architecturally optimized FreeBSD version if he
>>primary application is network services, IP forwarding and various 
>>TCP/UDP services ?
>>    
>>
>
>Not tried forwarding yet on 5x, but for TCP/UDP services, not speed
>problems with them on my box.
>
>Wait a bit till 5.3 is released and then bench market it after
>optimizing it.
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
>
>  
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4168BF5A.2050004>