Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:57:32 -0400 From: Michael Conlen <m@obmail.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1 and NFS Message-ID: <DAAC9DC3-D249-4F78-972C-AF7117D1CED2@obmail.net> In-Reply-To: <20060921184546.GA24778@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <C87B42D9-AF83-4DFC-9E13-53FCD874A444@obmail.net> <20060921182252.GA24321@xor.obsecurity.org> <FC0253C7-B04C-4609-96D0-BD8AACAB5646@obmail.net> <20060921184546.GA24778@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 21, 2006, at 2:45 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:42:44PM -0400, Michael Conlen wrote: >> >> On Sep 21, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:21:08PM -0400, Michael Conlen wrote: >>>> I recall that FreeBSD 6.1 had some NFS & lockd issues that were a >>>> show stopper at one time for me however I'm having trouble finding >>>> information on the current state of NFS. Anyone have a pointer to >>>> information? >>> >>> rpc.lockd remains unreliable; avoid using it if practical. >> >> This is becoming a show stopper for us moving forward with FreeBSD >> and may require us moving to a different OS (Linux or Solaris, each >> with significant downsides). Do you have a pointer on where I can >> track the issue so as to make a decision at some point in the future? > > There are a number of PRs I filed, but those aren't all of the > problems. It will require fairly major work to fix - the best hope > would be if someone was funded to work on it. Do you have an estimate of what kind of time is necessary to solve the problem? -- Michael Conlen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DAAC9DC3-D249-4F78-972C-AF7117D1CED2>