Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 11:17:49 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]: possible fix for the fifoor problem Message-ID: <200612041117.53989.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20061202143457.58db58d5@Magellan.Leidinger.net> References: <20061106174033.GA70360@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <17775.8117.809750.563506@gromit.timing.com> <20061202143457.58db58d5@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 02 December 2006 08:34 am, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting John E Hein <jhein@timing.com> (Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:15:17 -0700): > > Jung-uk Kim wrote at 16:16 -0500 on Nov 29, 2006: > > > This is fixed differently in P4: > > > > > > http://perforce.freebsd.org/changeView.cgi?CH=109652 > > > > This patch (a small, but important, subset of your REV 5 above) > > was good enough for me on 6.x - it seems to solve the problems > > I've been seeing with linux_seamonkey dialog boxes... > > [patch] > > Jung-uk, is this something you intent to commit soon, or is there > some stuff which needs to be changed first (the same questions > applies to the mknod stuff which removes the need to fsck the FS to > get rid of some unaccessible files after running the LTP)? I think both are safe to commit. I will do that soon. Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200612041117.53989.jkim>