Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 09:45:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Reifenberger <mike@reifenberger.com> To: xorquewasp@googlemail.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> Subject: Re: Request for opinions - gvinum or ccd? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905310931500.54922@gw.reifenberger.com> In-Reply-To: <20090530213643.GA1478@logik.internal.network> References: <20090530175239.GA25604@logik.internal.network> <20090530144354.2255f722@bhuda.mired.org> <20090530191840.GA68514@logik.internal.network> <20090530162744.5d77e9d1@bhuda.mired.org> <20090530213643.GA1478@logik.internal.network>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 30 May 2009, xorquewasp@googlemail.com wrote: ... > I'll definitely be looking at ZFS. Thanks for the info. > > I've never been dead set on any option in particular, it's just that I > wasn't aware of anything that would do what I wanted that wasn't just > simple RAID0 and manual backups. > Just for the record: ZFS is the only FreeBSD filesystem which ensures your data integrity. I've had dozends of silent block corruptions on SAMSUNG HD103UJ drives. Thanks to 'zfs scrub' I was able to recognize and repair the corruptions. Traditional RAID's only work if the whole drive fails. Bye/2 --- Michael Reifenberger Michael@Reifenberger.com http://www.Reifenberger.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0905310931500.54922>