Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:03:37 -0400
From:      Jonathan <jonathan@kc8onw.net>
To:        "Mahlon E. Smith" <mahlon@martini.nu>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS: drive replacement performance
Message-ID:  <4A5541E9.2050801@kc8onw.net>
In-Reply-To: <20090708001336.GA95670@martini.nu>
References:  <20090707195614.GA24326@martini.nu>	<b269bc570907071354r36015689ha362ba83413efc46@mail.gmail.com>	<20090707222631.GA70750@martini.nu>	<b269bc570907071532ub95af78i6ad3a09e8c6887d7@mail.gmail.com> <20090708001336.GA95670@martini.nu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/7/2009 8:13 PM, Mahlon E. Smith wrote:
> I also tried another export/import cycle, in the random hope that would
> stop the active replace -- no dice.  *However*, on the import, now I see
> this flooding my console (wasn't there previously, strangely):
>
> Jul  7 16:50:15 disobedience root: ZFS: vdev I/O failure, zpool=store path=/dev/da2 offset=262144 size=8192 error=6
> Jul  7 16:50:15 disobedience root: ZFS: vdev I/O failure, zpool=store path=/dev/da2 offset=499988824064 size=8192 error=6

I actually just had this exact issue with a dead drive, controller 
renumbering, and vdev I/O failure.  I eventually shut the system down 
completely, pulled the new drive, checked all the drive connections, 
powered the machine back up without the new drive.  Then I inserted the 
new drive and initiated a scan for it.  Apparently ZFS doesn't realize 
when a resilver is partially done because it resilvered in a matter of 
seconds at this point.  I then did a scrub which found several million 
checksum errors but successfully corrected the pool without any vdev I/O 
failure errors.

I hope this helps,
Jonathan Stewart



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A5541E9.2050801>