Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:22:24 +0400 From: c0re <nr1c0re@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw.ko and IPFIREWALL_FORWARD in GENERIC Message-ID: <AANLkTi=%2BP0dGznqQu736uCzHwjJkGDpZRUN3t9aMch5D@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100927193740.Q90633@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <AANLkTi=6RYR8CQc-HNTWgSGdEA3x-Q7VX5ywsidhXJQe@mail.gmail.com> <20100927193740.Q90633@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks Ian. Looks like switching to pf is the only option now. 2010/9/27 Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>: > On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, c0re wrote: > > =A0> Is there any possibility to see IPFIREWALL_FORWARD option for ipfw.k= o > =A0> in GENERIC? > =A0> Were there any patches about that? > =A0> I like freebsd-update, but lacking IPFIREWALL_FORWARD in GENERIC sto= ps > =A0> me from using freebsd-update. > > In a nutshell, no. =A0This thread covers why not .. or at least, not yet: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/2010-March/004148.html > > cheers, Ian >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=%2BP0dGznqQu736uCzHwjJkGDpZRUN3t9aMch5D>