Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:10:45 +0100 From: krad <kraduk@gmail.com> To: Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: long string using find and "-exec ls -ls" to find part-of filename Message-ID: <CALfReyeyDZB_pzomuE1dtVCh4EDP=WkUhn2vUjiNpy9CvtM8fg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140701043715.GB4635@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20140630045605.GA11147@ethic.thought.org> <53B0EFF2.80205@calorieking.com> <CA%2Bg%2BBvg1=o71ObOpbh4ry-=unj2HOjjmcQHX1DOeAfwyhLu=QQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140630053004.GB16901@ethic.thought.org> <CA%2Bg%2BBvh%2BDk0iYCjbGKVt59-nfDoCFQ6qmArrJu7ueaT7VzDi1g@mail.gmail.com> <20140630064044.GA25085@ethic.thought.org> <20140630230316.44ec3257.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140701043715.GB4635@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
i like xjobs, it work similar to xargs but can do things in parallel more easily than xargs On 1 July 2014 05:37, Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su> wrote: > Polytropon wrote: > > Allow me to add one little reminder: > > > > When using xargs, usually _one_ program will be executed > > with a command line containing _all_ results of the find > > command. If you want to run a program on _each_ of the > > results, this is the typical sh solution: > > > > find ... | while read F; do > > somecommand $F > > done > > It's easier to use "xargs -n1" which I do all the time. > > > -- > Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN > sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALfReyeyDZB_pzomuE1dtVCh4EDP=WkUhn2vUjiNpy9CvtM8fg>