Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:51:35 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@vlakno.cz> Cc: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status of clang on sparc64? Message-ID: <20140913165135.GA1572@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20140913082322.GA76218@vlakno.cz> References: <20140912000406.GA83874@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20140913082322.GA76218@vlakno.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:23:22AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 05:04:06PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > What's the current status for running clang on sparc64? > > Last time we played with this (february?) it was able to compile > a seemingly working world. So I guess it's not that terribly broken. > > We didnt test that much stuff though. > > > In particular, flame.freebsd.org is running 10.1-PRERELEASE > > compiled with gcc 4.2.1. Any chance that clanf can be > > made available on flame? > > I think your best bet is to compile it on flame yourself or crosscompile > world for sparc64 and use it on flame. > Was your testing with the in-tree llvm/clang or upstream? Should I try to compile lang/clang35 or lang/clang-devel? My main (and perhaps only) interest is to test the ld128 math libraries functions that I've been writing. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140913165135.GA1572>