Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:02:10 -0800
From:      Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org>
To:        Daniel Stekloff <dsteklof@cisco.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: QEMU?
Message-ID:  <47615782.7040002@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <47614A25.5090007@cisco.com>
References:  <47607390.4080108@cisco.com> <47609F89.9080107@freebsd.org> <4760CFB8.2030703@cisco.com> <4760E8CC.8070900@freebsd.org> <47614A25.5090007@cisco.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Daniel,

>>     cp /usr/src/release/powerpc/boot.tbxi ${4}/boot
>>     bootable="-hfs-bless ${4}/boot -map /usr/src/release/powerpc/hfs.map"
>>
>>  ... which I think is the equivalent of the -chrp-boot option you 
>> mention below.
>
> I did see this when I looked at the file, Debian has it as well. If 
> -chrp-boot is equivalent, why does Debian have both?

  Just had a dig through mkisofs source: looks like there is a 
difference between using -chrp-boot and -hfs-bless. They both use a CHRP 
boot script, but the -chrp-boot option appears to do something in the 
iso header.

  You may want to unpack the FreeBSD cd and re-pack with Debian-style 
options and see what happens.

later,

Peter.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47615782.7040002>