Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:02:29 +0200 From: Goran Lowkrantz <glz@hidden-powers.com> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Port for ACE-6.0.4 Message-ID: <3715EABBE36365A3573F12DC@[172.16.2.134]> In-Reply-To: <4E9BD6FB.8040803@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <CANS_YATVB80ADNgeG09fJHAK63cE5jeOoU0f%2Bc1OgBBF8YsFag@mail.gmail.com> <4E95DF17.6030103@yandex.ru> <CANS_YAQ1cYCO-5OOErv4o_mD3z2PTfBa10ujHDeO5m7YLDnduw@mail.gmail.com> <2CCA979ECF3C7EFFDDC39094@10.255.253.2> <CANS_YARS7bxT-kd8Gk7G10%2B3ujVjekqcQno1zst5OuNUH=D_gQ@mail.gmail.com> <56583972E78D48F91156BD98@[10.255.253.2]> <4E9BD6FB.8040803@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On October 17, 2011 8:19:23 +0100 Matthew Seaman
<m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote:
> On 17/10/2011 02:45, Goran Lowkrantz wrote:
>> - Both devel/ace5 and devel/ace6 installs version 5 of shared libraries.
>> Should not devel/ace6 install version 6?
>
> Um... no. Not unless the ABI has changed.
>
Which is why I put the question, the need to verify. I would not expect ACE
to change major number due to marketing pressure so the probability that
there are incompatible changes between major versions is significant.
/glz
---
"There is hopeful symbolism in the fact that flags do not wave in a vacuum."
-- Arthur C. Clarke
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3715EABBE36365A3573F12DC>