Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:24:53 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmom8h9HANbsX=LMRDPr7oObVYdw3eA%2BP5NQNptXhCizJzg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EED10EF.1030108@FreeBSD.org> References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <CAJ-FndDniGH8QoT=kUxOQ%2BzdVhWF0Z0NKLU0PGS-Gt=BK6noWw@mail.gmail.com> <4EE2AE64.9060802@m5p.com> <4EE88343.2050302@m5p.com> <CAFHbX1%2B5PttyZuNnYot8emTn_AWkABdJCvnpo5rcRxVXj0ypJA@mail.gmail.com> <4EE933C6.4020209@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <CAPjTQNEJDE17TLH-mDrG_-_Qa9R5N3mSeXSYYWtqz_DFidzYQw@mail.gmail.com> <4EECD261.2080208@m5p.com> <4EED05EC.8050103@FreeBSD.org> <CAJ-VmokoexQdgcWsW5ufGHCdQ-nzdPcjgYyftA52eSNGcurpfw@mail.gmail.com> <4EED10EF.1030108@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17 December 2011 14:00, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: > on 17/12/2011 23:20 Adrian Chadd said the following: >> This may -not- be a userland specific problem.. > That's an interesting idea. =A0From the recent discussion about USB I can= conclude > that USB threads run at higher priority than GEOM threads: PI_NET/PI_DISK= vs > PRIBIO. =A0The former is from the ithread range, the latter is from the r= egular > kernel range. =A0Maybe it would make sense to give the GEOM threads a pri= ority > from the ithread range too - given their role and importance. Ah, so I can just punt this to you? Sweet! *punt*. I haven't had time to dig into the network side of things but I do plan on doing this soon. Hopefully something really silly shows up. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmom8h9HANbsX=LMRDPr7oObVYdw3eA%2BP5NQNptXhCizJzg>