Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:05:12 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Harrison Grundy <harrison.grundy@astrodoggroup.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: locks and kernel randomness... Message-ID: <20150225100512.GC74514@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <54ED9A4B.4060802@astrodoggroup.com> References: <20150224182507.GI46794@funkthat.com> <54ECEA43.2080008@freebsd.org> <20150224231921.GQ46794@funkthat.com> <1424822522.1328.11.camel@freebsd.org> <20150225002956.GT46794@funkthat.com> <2F49527F-2F58-4BD2-B8BE-1B1190CCD4D0@bsdimp.com> <54ED5656.50607@astrodoggroup.com> <20150225090638.GB74514@kib.kiev.ua> <54ED92E5.4010803@astrodoggroup.com> <54ED9A4B.4060802@astrodoggroup.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 01:47:55AM -0800, Harrison Grundy wrote: > Three choices here are attached here: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197922 > > The only remaining one I don't have a patch for is putting a "real" PRNG > in ULE. > > At this point, as far as ULE goes, It just comes down to picking from > one of those approaches. The third patch, ' Creates sched_random, using the system used in cpu_search.', seems to miss updating the dpcpu randomval in sched_random(), isn't it ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150225100512.GC74514>